Hey team,
my housemates just got this $700
solar cooker. I have never seen the man make an impulse purchase before in my life, but he's got religion, I guess. Anyway, he wants it to be used and generously lets anyone of us use it, plus neighbors.
So, I think this is awesome. I also see that it's way over-priced for what it needs to be, and has some design flaws (for New England) and some manufacturing defects. And I'm not sure how long it will last in a place that has, say, wind.
But what I like:
--good educational thing, can show it to kids and neighbors and it heats up FAST (can burn a leaf in seconds)
--no fuel needed. Minimal embodied
energy when compared with any other stove you would buy
--heats hot
enough to pressure-cook some sweet potatoes, potatoes, and borsch all in one day in November in New England
--heat is focused in one area so you'd have to be exactly there to burn yourself--less likely to have an accident
don't like:
--not angeled for low sun (<22 degrees at the solstice in these parts)
--doesn't work when there's even a slight cloud (I know this is hard to wkr around, but a thermal battery or thermal mass would help
--pricey. Cf the $5 version in Uganda (youtube) out of a tyre, or, if you're short a tire, a pit in the ground, or, in my case, a flower pot. (tinfoil and crumpled paper and a window pane).
--has to be tended: not safe if random kids or people are walking by; also, could tip over, looks wobbly on its base; and you need to turn it to keep sun angled properly every 10" or so, 15" max I'd guess
--really needs the (dark-colored) pressure cooker to be useful
interesting points:
--can teach the concept, proof of concept, in seconds
--burning a leaf with it makes it more tangible and palpable--we tend to associate smoke with heat
--burning a dry leaf can leave a flaming leaf-chunk flying around, NOT safe in fall in New England and especially not perceived as safe. Better to use a wetter leaf, even if it doesn't burn as dramatically
--can reach 700 in ideal situation; I think it's getting to 500 here in winter
--shows people just how much energy there is per square meter
--focuses the heat not on thte whole pot bottom but at one spot
It was a weird feeling to see something sizzling the first time, with no fuel source! now we're cooking without gas!
Thoughts? anyone else tried one? I searched but search did not show me any solsource posts. PS this was designed for use in the Himalayas (Tibet) to save people from having to use
firewood and spend money for fuel. I say it's good for cooking, not so much for baking/casseroles/slow cooking.