thomas rubino wrote:Hi Randy;
Common rmh construction has been using shiners. (Bricks stood on the long narrow side with the broad face exposed.)
I see no reason you could not lay them as stretchers, were you thinking soldier or sailor pattern? (Bricks laid flat with narrow side exposed)
For a long while, I thought batch boxes needed a flat roof.
Recently Peter said they do not.
So, I see no reason not to corbel the roof.
Be sure to take lots of pictures to share your build with us.
There is a lot to this
thread that I apparently don't understand the terms. I will list and comment but certainly will enjoy return comments:
1) If bricks stood on the long narrow side, then wouldn't the long narrow side be exposed? to the heat, If you lay flat, then the flat wide side would be exposed? ( much less bricks, but maybe the whole point was a thick bell top?
2) Perhaps I have always mis understood "corbel" as I always thought that meant to Lay out from a vertical structure, but I am presuming we are meaning to lay in towards the center. Is there a maximum IN per layer? Can this be done without a supporting structure? Even if it would take 2' or more to close in?
3) Perhaps I read this wrong, but at the top of the bell,
we don't want Insulated fire brick? do we? I think Peter always said from the top of the riser to the top of the bell should be fire brick as well. Please correct if I am thinking wrong, as my standard bricks cost me $0.10 each and my fire brick about $1.25 each, so a pretty big difference.
4) Somewhere in here, I think the original poster said " I am going to make the riser as high as possible" I always thought that was pretty important to follow the % HEIGHT of Riser- thus specked for each size of stove, i.e. 5, 6 or all the way up to 10"
As you can see, I was not aware we could stray very dramatically from the specs for a given size stove, including the Inner Surface Area, of a single bell.
Inquiring minds want to know.