Building regenerative Christian villages @ https://jesusvillage.org/
100+ Homesteading Software Tools @ https://homestead.tools/
T Simpson wrote:I don't know but the reviews across all his books on Amazon the reviews are all suspiciously in similar increments with nearly every publication hovering around the same average star rating regardless of publication method.
The Spanish versions and Goodreads listings seem to show this trend more clearly. Like ~5 people rate it highly. But maybe the more popular English Amazon listings get more bot reviews purchased.
Could be a coincidence, maybe he's got a very dedicated fanbase that buys all his books in a category and they all leave similar reviews...but seems more like bot reviews to me.
Without analyzing the content and reviews closely I can't be certain.
r ranson wrote:Mistakes not exclusive to ai authors. I've known many a real human made excessive mistakes in books. Much worse now that self publishing is so easy. Fact checkers and editing just slow things down.
More interesting to me is how to read critically. How to evaluate what we read for internal inconsistencies and how it compares with what we know of the world.
Even colouring books have a high chance of being ai generated now. I got one on roosters and not one bird had fewer than 12 toes. They even left some of the shutterstock logos in. Another publication that would have benefited from a real human glancing at it before publishing.
That said, there is a lot of good stuff on homesteading written by real humans in the digital market here on permies.
All true wealth is biological.
Lois McMaster Bujold
Dian Green wrote:I have heard that there are a bunch of foraging books that are ai written by identities with fake bios that are showing up on Amazon. That is potentially VERY dangerous!
At least, info that it is happening showed up in my Tumblr feed, so some people are spreading the word out there.
I thought the tiktok "plant hack" guy was bad enough! At least most of what I've seen of his stuff is just kinda dumb and not likely to work well long term, ( or introduce invasive plants to unsuitable places) but not actively dangerous.
Kyle Hayward wrote:Review Meta, https://reviewmeta.com/ a site where you put in the amazon link to the product and it scans it for bad reviews has that book adjusted from a 4.4 down to 4.0 stars and it removed "40% of potentially unnatural reviews" with an "Overall Fail review grade".
His bio reads very generic with no vocational or educational resume and all the book titles are generic and seem to cover most permie topics.
Also image search pulls up a picture of a young guy as a writer, but Amazon bio pic has an older guy?
Not many actual written reviews on Goodreads and plenty of grammar complaints there as well.
I'm only 65! That's not to old to learn to be a permie, right?
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons - for you are crunchy and good with ketchup. Crunchy tiny ad:
heat your home with yard waste and cardboard
https://freeheat.info
|