posted 15 years ago
you do have to defend satire it is the easiest form of opinion for people to absorb a great part of news papers are articles of opinion, we don't have to agree with the opinion but the constant weighing up of all the different opinions around make for a more mentally agil population and a ignorant population may always go for the throat of somone you don't approve of but it may also be swayed to go against you.
Not everyones opinion will be yours or will be what you agree with but then that goes for everyone.
Giving opinions can be a excuse for going for other peoples throats or just obstructing other peoples activities. It can be an excuse for bullying, every good idea can be put to a bad use, how constant is the drip of opinions and how exagerated, bullies lie and twist your words and take them out of context or take something you have once said and use it as an example of your character though they know very well that as a rule you fight for the opposite. Maybe they don't it is so much to their advantage to find others wrong that they lose all objectivity, they only catch the mean or stupid or ignorant things you say. They have not been told that criticism is ego satisfying, if you pull them up they say but you have criticised so and so, lord, a criticism and really going for trying to pull everyone after one person are very different things, the proof of whether you have tried to really lay another low or not is in the pudding, how many epople have you totally isolated, if you have not, then you have criticisesd not gone for the others throat.
ONe arguement is that you just weren't good enough at doing for others you would if you could. people who go for others throats talk about the importance of really learning others and the more reasonable people talk about being carefull to only go so far.
Fear plays a part in the actions of those who cut you from your gizzard to your zatch if you step on their toes, if you want your children to be real winners let them think that if they don't get those who criticise them right out of the way, those people will do for them, don't teach them that you criticise a bit but try to make sure you don't take all the peoples frinds or if you see they are really getting freindless or being gnawed to peices you reverse the trend and start to praise them and pull people back towards approving of them. The good teach limits to going for people the dangerouse teach slitting anyone who criticises them throat psychologiaclly an dsocially.
THere is really a difference between hitting somone so hard yuou break their bones and giving them knock though the canny manage to twist things in such a way as to make the light knock look as if it had murderouse intent and the real hard blow the sustained pressure the rain of blows look as if it were a light knock.
Classism and racism and such don't just exist because the world is unfair there is a counsciose or less counsciose attempt to invalidate women or people of african origen or the poor actual twisting the truth maliciosely to protect your priveledge and actually making an effort to keep information out of their way so you can claim your superiority , with out all the information peoples make bad choices.. For instance the magic trick of pretending the poor work less than the rich, the canny know how to spread lies lies that the innocent would never imagine would stick.
You get the poor working for nearly nothing and if they don't really kill themselves doing things for you you pretend they are wasting your time and money. Never mention what they have done, only mention that break they took, is one trick of the less nice or more machevaelian type of leader.
Is not it one of the things americans are proud of having a population that reads knewspapers and can judge the political situation and vote responsibly. South Park does not have an all out attack on one group, they attack all groups they must be one of the least obectionable types of opinion around. Fox knews has an all out sustained attack on the left, and jon stewart on the right though i would say john stewart keeps himself with in the limits of reasonable and fair criticism and fox is really exagerated.
I can only imagine the very well heeled morally disliking south park, tholse who have got themselves into a position were everyone believes they are honerable members of society and everyone else the hippies and the poor are the irresponsable ones, an dthose people are somtimes where they are r because they have gullied everyone else, they are in fact lounge potatoes . I live with someone who never mention a job i have done never recognises the importantce of anythign i do and is always ready with a list of thigns i have not done, he does not feear being discredited if he exagerates, he starts pulling you down froom day one when you are busy being loyal and so by the time you realise how he has prepared the ground and start to try to reverse the trend he has won so much ground that your chances of ever recovering are slim. . All i used to do was supportive ,what i now do, looking after my own projects, is a new me who looks after themselves to some extent. I have to learn to earn money too agri rose macaskie.