Nancy Reading wrote:Can anyone explain what he means there? Or is it mistranscibed, or a bit missing? It seems that waste is the product of 'not working' in the example he gives.
I think there's a bit missing, and also it's two examples -
"when you look at a whole system there are two things that are very undesirable - one is work and the other is pollution"
If you look at the first example -
"Work is a result of not supplying every component in your system with its needs. Now lets put that in another way...If you didn't put a tank on your chicken house you got to carry the water to the chickens. So you incur work." It's about designing things so that work is reduced.
Then the second example -
"Now if you didn't collect the eggs from the chicken house, that's pollution. Pollution is an unused resource." This is about teaching you to value all the products of a system because if any aren't put to use they can become pollution.
The bit that doesn't make sense to me is the bit he puts in before the two examples -
"Pollution is a product of work.". Either I'm missing something or he mis-spoke. Maybe pollution is a product of not doing the work you should, like collecting the eggs? Or maybe he means that if you do some work, like putting the chickens in a chicken house, but don't finish the work, like collecting the eggs, then that is what creates pollution.