That's a good one (the builditsolar heat calculator).
I think with R30 in Georgia you won't need much heat, and an 8" J-type heater would probably do it with heat to spare. I think the 6" J-type might be too small given the unpredictable winter storms the East Coast has been getting lately. Georgia sounds warm to us northerners, but you do sometimes get snow I know.
Another good general reference is
http://www.huduser.org/portal/resources/UtilityModel/hdd.html the Heating Degree Days (HDD) lookup tool. Builditsolar also has an HDD map.
Just from experience:
- a 6" heater has worked for anything from 120 sq.ft. (fired twice a week) up to about 800 sq.ft. (fired each evening in the coldest months, did not heat the back room due to 2 intervening walls/poor insulation)
in the Portland, OR area (NW Oregon near the coast. Oregon is the one between Washington and California. Middle of the West Coast.) That's about 4500 HDD, and the larger building was 4" stick-frame with poor insulation, probably not more than R-19 at best.
- an 8" heater has worked for anything from 3000-5000 sq.ft. in coastal California (2300 HDD, insulation unknown) to about 1500 sq.ft. in north-central Washington or upstate NY (6000-8000 HDD/yr) with at least R-30 insulation.
The past two winters we've used about 1.3 to 1.5 cords, and as we're sometimes gone I'd play it safe and estimate we'd burn up to 2 cords if we were home all winter during a cold one in north-central WA. That's about what the 3000 to 5000 sf house in CA burned the first year they were using it, so that's a pretty doable firing schedule. They had oak/madrone, we had pine/fir/larch, and you can guesstimate the BTU/cord here:
http://www.chimneysweeponline.com/howoodbtu.htm
So that gives you a rough BTU estimate.
Very roughly: the
wood's heat value is between 15 and 35 MBTU per cord (as calculated for an 80% efficient woodstove burning willow, or a 100% theoretically efficient woodstove burning Osage Orange).
So that's somewhere between 30 and 70 MBTU that a good 8" heater is putting out during a year's use, which really is probably the 6 or 7 colder months, with heavy use for 2 to 4 months.
When I've worked it out on paper, calculating the theoretical heat loss for our 840 sf home with R30 insulation using that build-it-solar site and the actual larch/fir
firewood numbers, it seems like we are getting almost every BTU that's theoretically possible from the firewood we actually burned. Or, we are deluding ourselves and living happily at a somewhat lower temperature than we think. (We weighed each load of wood for weeks at a time one winter to test the theory; we are running at something under 10% moisture content when we get our wood in on time, and the exhaust temp is lower than for a woodstove, so I estimated using the middle heat value of about 7000BTU/lb. On larch, it would be about 22MBTU per cord). There's really not much heat lost to exhaust, like they estimate happens for woodstoves; you shut the stove down for at least 12 hours per day, usually more like 16 to 20 hours, and don't lose any heat to the exhaust during that time.
I think there's one other
rocket mass heater I've heard about at secondhand, built in Georgia, that's an 8" system and it's heating a conventional home (probably around 2000 sq.ft.) quite nicely.
Incidentally, for anything short of a month-long muggy heat wave with no drop in night-time temperatures, you may also see some cooling benefit as well. We stopped running our stove in June, and in the Portland home we didn't have to get the fans down from the attic at all the following 2 summers that we'd needed before the stove went in. Kept the indoor temps 10 to 20 degrees cooler than outside. If you get a cool night-time or early-morning breeze, you can even chill it a bit to take up more of the daytime heat.
House Plan:
Whether this heat will reach the rooms evenly would be a question of circulation. Transoms are not a bad idea, but line-of-sight on the barrel is better. Even just a bit of that radiant heat through an open door makes a difference.
Having the heater between the LR and MBR sounds good. The ASTM E1602 standard for masonry heaters describes how to do "wing walls" to connect heaters that go through walls with any combustible framing where the standard walls take up again. Of
course you can also just do a fully-masonry wall, completely non-combustible.
The main question is whether you'll need supplemental heat in those kids' BRs at the far end of the house. Can you put the kitchen stove, and/or the
water heater, on that wall so the smaller BR's get some latent heat from those appliances?
Another option might be to shift things a bit. Can you run the main corridor of the house sideways, toward the right as you've currently oriented the plans? Shift those kids' BR's to just beyond the LR/Kitchen, so that one of them shares a wall with the LR and the other with the kitchen. Then you'd only have one wall between them and the heat source, and you could probably get line-of-sight on the heater's radiant bell/barrel with the smaller BR doors open. The only down side is they have to go past the kitchen to get to the bathroom, and you might end up with more midnight snacking on the way back than absolutely necessary
. You can leave the bathroom as-is, swap it with the kitchen and leave a sort of breakfast nook in between, or leave it as-is and consider a WC for the other two bedrooms (just a toilet and sink).
Given that you rarely have truly evil cold snaps, maybe if the kids occasionally take a hot brick to bed when they want one, the plan might still be OK as-is. Or consider letting them camp out on the heater bench in uber-cold weather. If they're guest BR's / spare rooms, then I wouldn't worry about it; how often do you have overnight guests in a nasty storm? If one's an office, then you can also use the hot brick trick for the office-sitter's toes.
Hope that helps.
-Erica W