Peter Ellis wrote:Of course there is a financial incentive, without the government stepping up and paying people. Problem with it is that people do not see how things are connected, so they don't get it until someone hands them a dollar for doing a thing. When doing the thing results in them paying five dollars less for something, few people understand that they just got five dollars for doing the thing....
I think we all realize that it'll be better for these people to harvest water. No water means no water for anyone. People just don't get it. So yeah, a government subsidy for it would go a long way. I think reducing property taxes would be a good way of going about it. Now to get that to the people who matter.............