• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies living kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education experiences global resources the cider press projects digital market permies.com all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Nicole Alderman
  • r ranson
  • paul wheaton
  • Burra Maluca
  • Jocelyn Campbell
  • Miles Flansburg
  • Devaka Cooray
garden masters:
  • Dave Burton
  • Anne Miller
  • Daron Williams
  • Greg Martin
  • Joseph Lofthouse
  • James Freyr
  • Bryant RedHawk

Open hearth vs rocket mass heater  RSS feed

Posts: 71
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Doesn't an open hearth achieve the same end as a rmh assuming a reasonably well insulated home? Both involve the heat being all soaked up and the smoke leaving at a low temperature through a small hole. Unless an open hearth isn't legally possible for you I just don't see the point of spending money building a rocket mass heater and having it take up space in your house. Plus you can't cook with them as far as I'm aware.

Sorry to those of you who are really invested in these things. To be fair open hearths might never catch on due to being perceived as dangerous or illegal in too many places. I guess it's also less practical for people who live in conventional homes built without the forethought that someone might want one.

But still, for people building their own cabin, underground house, cob/straw bale house or what have you I think a hearth is the way to go.
Posts: 2946
Location: Southern alps, on the French side of the french /italian border 5000ft high Southern alpine climate.
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Loki Tims, have you thought that an open fire is far less efficient than a closed fire, with the right amount of air supply, and heat "concentration" ?


Open wood fires are about 20% efficient.  A rocket, can be in the range of 90%

Heat recovery, and ambient air loss is also at play.

Heat recovery in an open hearth, might be in the order of 10% of the heat  recovered. And if the fumes are cold, this is not due to only the fumes going up the chimney, but because of air dilution. The chimney sucks huge amounts of hot air, with your smoke. So you're cooling the home, to heat the home.

This is why stoves have been invented, and refined.

garden master
Posts: 2197
Location: USDA Zone 8a
bee dog food preservation greening the desert hunting cooking purity trees
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have had a fireplace, which I think you are calling an open hearth.  I don't ever want one of them again.

If I had the space for a rmh, I would love to have one as I can see so many more benefits.  

Here is a thread that might help:

Posts: 1727
Location: latitude 47 N.W. montana zone 6A
cat pig rocket stoves
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This is really simple.  With an open fire be it a pit or a fireplace. You must keep that fire lit to stay warm.  Fire goes out cold comes in ...
With a rocket mass heater (which can be cooked on) you build your fire for as long as you think you need and you let it go out. Fire goes out mass sheds heat , you sleep toasty warm all night .
Open fire takes armloads of wood and waking up several times to stay warm . RMH takes one armload and your warm all night with NO CHANCE of rolling into your fire overnight.
Evil is afoot. But this tiny ad is just an ad:
Grow a Salad in Your City Apartment E-book - By Rosemary Hansen
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!