• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Carla Burke
  • Nancy Reading
  • John F Dean
  • r ranson
  • Jay Angler
  • paul wheaton
stewards:
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Leigh Tate
  • Devaka Cooray
master gardeners:
  • Christopher Weeks
  • Timothy Norton
gardeners:
  • thomas rubino
  • Matt McSpadden
  • Jeremy VanGelder

Bulk cleaning and especially rust removal from bolts, screws, and other small hardware

 
gardener
Posts: 3545
Location: Central Oklahoma (zone 7a)
1259
forest garden trees woodworking
  • Likes 7
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


This is a grade 8 bolt, four inches long, one inch thick, made in the USA by Nucor Fastener.  It has a tensile strength of 150,000 PSI -- well over twice the strength of a "common" grade 2 bolt with no markings on the head.  It also has a history; those chisel marks on the head tell me a story of a long day, a torch, a broken cheater bar, a cold chisel, a heavy hammer, a lot of cussing, and, finally, a talented mechanic who not only knew how to break it loose, but had the self-control not to throw the miserable fuckin' thing as far as he could into the weeds when he finally got it out.  I never knew that guy, because I bought it from his estate sale, along with fifteen more gallons of similar hardware. I don't know him, but I've known plenty like him, including my own father.  

There's some corrosion markings on the bolt head and some rough spots on the threads, that I couldn't see under the original coating of rust.  Until I find and clean a matching nut, I won't know for sure if the bolt still threads.  A purist might prefer a new one, but a man who needs a good hard grade 8 bolt this size might decide to make it work.  Especially considering that a new replacement of this grade/quality will cost you fifteen bucks if you're buying in retail quantities.  At the tractor dealership, you would put in a new bolt and bill the client for top-notch perfectionist work.  In your own shop, well, it depends.

Anyway, this is an old thread but the problem of bulk hardware cleaning persists.  What really got me thinking about it again was the related problem of rusty tool restoration.  I didn't work in the shop much during the pandemic, because the biggest risk of forced exposure to the virus where I am is/was a chance encounter with the cops in a traffic stop. None of those guys were wearing masks or respecting social distancing.  So, until we got vaccinated, we weren't doing optional/frivolous driving errands, and the shop I play in is ten minutes away.  Didn't matter so much, because I wasn't doing garage sales either, so I didn't have the constant influx of "new" goodies to play with and clean up.  But now I do again.

I never tried an electrolysis experiment like we discussed higher in the thread.  No matter how you set it up, you're generating potentially explosive gasses (oxygen and hydrogen) at the electrodes.  It's easy to ventilate the risk down to virtually nothing, but in/near a borrowed shop it's not my place to be creating even tiny risks that are avoidable.  So that line of experimentation remains for when I get my own shop space.

By chance I came across some videos of vibratory tumblers being used to clean rusty hardware.  This was #6 on my list of approaches in the original post last year:

Dan Boone wrote:
6) Bulk vibratory abrasion methods.  Similar to above but using a commercial vibratory cleaner vessel that just shakes, without tumbling.  Always with a purchased abrasive medium, sometimes with added liquid.  Noisy, usually requires an expensive purpose-built power tool, said to deliver pretty good results.



There's an almost-standard vibratory tumblr out there that comes in two sizes (small and bigger) from a variety of sources; it looks to me like there's one fairly expensive made-in-USA product (from Eastwood) and a whole bunch of copycat versions made in China and sold at places like Harbor Freight.  All the copycats may be from the same factory with different brand names on them, as is common with Chinese-origin tools.  The quality is said to be lesser.  

What I learned from my recent spate of video-watching is that using these tumblers to clean rusty parts requires some technique.  YouTube is full of unboxing-type videos where somebody gets the new toy, turns it on, dumps in the dry walnut-shell media (actually for polishing) that comes free with the unit, throws in some rusty bolts, runs it for a couple hours, pulls out the still-disappointingly-rusty bolts, and says some version of "well, they're better, won't need as much time on the wire wheel, I was hoping for more".  

Then, too, a lot of those guys are restoring classic cars.  They don't just want "enough rust removed so that the threads work again" -- they want mirror-polished bolts, every speck of rust and paint and original finish removed, so they can send their hardware out to be electroplated.  Vibratory tumbling can get you a long distance closer to that, but my research suggests it can't get you all the way there.  You still need a wire wheel or sandblasting step, and if you're gonna do that anyway, what did the tumbler really gain you?

Me, I just want all the crusty rust gone.  I don't do projects that depend on hardware with perfect finishes.  

Despite all the disappointed-newbie videos, a few -- very few! -- shop guys have videos that go further, experimenting with different tumbling media and especially with adding liquid (usually water) and soap (dish detergent or Simple Green most commonly).    That makes the project a lot messier!  But dust-free, so probably a lot safer.  




The consensus seems to be that "the green media" -- basically, hard plastic triangles impregnated with mystery abrasives -- is the best stuff for rusty bolts/tools, but it has to be run wet to be effective.  Downsides: the stuff is hideously expensive ($8-$10 per pound, and at the five-to-one recommended ratio of media to dirty hardware, you need 12-15 pounds to do a full load in the bigger-size 18lb-capacity tumbler) and worse yet, it's relatively soft, so it wears out fairly quickly.  (How many batches? Nobody will quite say, but not all that many.)  This would not work for me; beyond the expense, I am put off by the wastefulness of it. I need a thrifty media or none of this makes sense for me.

The second-best suggestion: "heavy media" such as ceramic triangles, cubes, and spheres, and/or tiny stainless steel pins (or old screws!) or good old-fashioned washed river gravel (some say, sand).  Always run wet, always run with soap.  Of course the stainless steel pins and fancy ceramic shapes are at least as expensive, when bought by the pound as tumbling media, as the plastic pyramids.  

Because the heavy media is heavy, you can't really put enough of it in an 18lb-capacity tumblr to physically fill it as much as is needful.  So there are different strategies for adding "bulking" media that is not so hard, but hard enough to be useful, and much lighter per volume.  Small hardwood shapes, a variety of plastic pellets, the glass beads used in sandblasting cabinets, even oddball stuff like bone chunks or the little cubes of tempered glass that you get when you shatter a tempered-glass panel.  

The deeper I got into the research, the more I kept hearing that, for the specific project of rusty bolts and tools, diversity in the tumbling media was the key, along with the soapy water.  Lots of different materials in all different sizes and shapes, the more the merrier.  As the softer items grind down into dust/mud, wash them out with lots of clean water (a bucket and screen is suggested) and replace them with larger items, so you always have a spectrum of size and varying textures.

And as for me?  I am garage-sale-man!  I can buy an endless amount of ugly ceramic tchotchkes for less than a dollar a pound, and do the world a favor by pounding them into "a diversity of sizes and shapes".  I can "make" tempered-glass cubes or small hardwood shapes.  This was beginning to sound more promising.  (I could also get endless small collections of plastic beads of various kinds for nearly no money, but I'm really not interested in using plastic media; manufacturing a microplastics waste stream is not my idea of a socially-useful upcycling.)

So, after all this research, I got it in my head that I really wouldn't mind trying out one of these vibratory tumblers.  And then serendipity! A side hustle paid off unexpectedly and I wound up with a couple hundred extra bucks in my mad-money account.  Was gonna go to Harbor Freight but my amazing online-shopper spouse found a Chinese-branded version (almost certainly identical) on Amazon for thirty bucks less.  Took a week to get delivered, but it arrived yesterday:



So far, I don't have any "light" media.  And -- potential snag -- the instructions with my unit warn that using heavy media can "prematurely" wear out the plastic bowl.  Fairly warned, I am.  But (a) bowl replacements are readily available; and (b) I am pretty sure I can fabricate a better bowl out of a steel pot if the wear issues prove too severe.

For media, I did order two pounds of the expensive small mix of ceramic shapes, just to get me started. Plus I had a four-pound jar of nicely washed and pre-sorted tiny river stones from, perhaps, a big-box store garden center.



As for ceramic tchotchkes, they come in varying degrees of hardness; harder (porcelain) is better, whereas the thicker stuff is often a softer stoneware with a good glaze.  I'm no expert, but I spent seventy-five cents last weekend at various garage sales picking out unloved and unlovable porcelain-looking ceramic items.  The chipped mug was the real heavy-porcelain deal; far harder than the buddha incense holder (?) or the swan candlestick, and rather difficult to smash up.



All told, the media I threw in weighed about eight pounds, of my 18-lb weight budget.  Throw in a pint of water, I'm at 9 pounds. Five pounds of rusty junk leaves room for up to four pounds of lighter media once I source some.  Click the pic if you want to see the rusty crusts in high-res horrifying glory:



So, as my mother's bread recipe begins, "into the bowl, dump..."  It quickly became clear that the concrete finishing tool didn't really fit; it was too large to become submerged in the limited volume of media.  So I took it right back out. Added the pint of water and a splash of Simple Green.  Started up the unit.



This all happened today.  I ran the tumbler for two hours.  Maybe one day I'll leave it running unattended; it is noisy.  But as for now, I don't trust it not to vibrate off its table onto the floor, or not to disassemble itself from all the vibration.  So I settled for a two hour test.  It's my expectation that really challenging items may need to go for 8-12 hours, but bolt threads might suffer and get peened over from a run so long.  I needed to look inside after two hours, for science; and I needed to go home anyway. Time to look:



And you know what?  My excessively rusty hardware is manifestly not done.  But the extent of rust removal, especially on the threaded items, is AMAZING!  I am ridiculously pleased.   I really can't wait to see what longer runs do for some of those rustiest pieces.  

I was also pleased that two hours was enough to take all the sharp edges off my porcelain shards, so it was safe to rummage through the media with my hands to retrieve my stuff.  I was not sure how long that would take.  

There are several rinky-dink "features" to this tumbler.  It has a drain hose that has nothing at the inside-the-bowl end of the fitting (like a screen?) to keep small media from vibrating down into the drain hose and lodging against the clamp.  The main handwheels (modern plastic wing-nut equivalents) that screw everything together are prone to unscrewing themselves under vibration, and need more robust lockwashers (which I have).  The gaskets between the bowl and the lid are not well-attached (not attached at all, actually) to either the bowl or the lid, so they keep flopping around and need to be secured with adhesive. Minor annoyances, but the mark of a tool either not-well-designed or that's been visited by the unit-cost-reducing suck-fairy.  

That said, I like my new toy/indulgence.  I think that if I baby it with great care, I can use it to easily clean big batches of hardware.  I will, of course, report back as experiences accumulate.  
 
pioneer
Posts: 284
62
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
On board ship we used 'bug juice', aka koolaid, to clean and brighten our brass fire nozzles. Cherry worked best. It would eat all the green verdigris inside and out. It's a very mild acid.
Some of the suck up divisions would follow that proccess up with a metal polish to impress the XO for daily inspections. (major eye roll) 🤣
 
Dan Boone
gardener
Posts: 3545
Location: Central Oklahoma (zone 7a)
1259
forest garden trees woodworking
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have been using the vibratory tumbler to good effect.  What seems to work best is to do my rusty hardware in runs about two to two-and-a-half hours long.  I've been doing before-and-after photo documentations of each run, which is a minor pain but the stuff needs to be laid out afterwards anyway to have light lubricant sprayed on it to prevent flash rust.  I propose to post the before/afters for a number of these runs so people can see how well it does or does not work.  

Bottom line, it works great at turning rusty stuff into working stuff to a certain point.  That amount of rust that makes old crap unpleasant to work with -- threads sticky, impossible to read the markings, feels nasty in your hand and stains your fingers red -- cleans up great in a single run.  The next level (black stains in the metal under the red rust) is variable; usually two runs is sufficient.  The level after that (deep pits full of rust with the black at the bottom of the pits) may or may not ever clean up, at least with the tumbling media I am using.  You'll see items appearing again and again in some of these runs as I keep giving them another pass through the machine. I take out the stuff I'm happy with and move it into the appropriate toolbox or hardware collection, then add more rusty "crap" treasures.



old-hardware-run-2-before.jpg
2nd run in the vibratory tumbler: before
2nd run in the vibratory tumbler: before
old-hardware-run-2-after.jpg
2nd run in the vibratory tumbler: after
2nd run in the vibratory tumbler: after
 
Dan Boone
gardener
Posts: 3545
Location: Central Oklahoma (zone 7a)
1259
forest garden trees woodworking
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Third run. The ancient pipe wrench was nothing but pits and dents and more rust under the rust.  Running it last time let me see that it didn't have any interesting markings or promising restoration potential.  I tested it to destruction trying various methods of getting it un-seized, and I learned some stuff before it went to the scrap bin.  This run was also a test of aluminum cleaning (that handsome equine fence post topper) and a third pass for those handsome 1950s garden pruners, which I am trying to get clean enough to read the markings stamped in the metal.  Plus I was curious to see what would happen with that strange white corrosion on the (galvanized?) C-clamp.  

Notice that the really heavily pitted items aren't improving much any more.  It might be that sharper tumbling media (heavy ceramic triangles, or ???) would have a more aggressive chew at them, but I can always try that later.


old-hardware-run-3-before.jpg
Third run in the vibratory tumbler: before
Third run in the vibratory tumbler: before
old-hardware-run-3-after.jpg
Third run in the vibratory tumbler: after
Third run in the vibratory tumbler: after
 
Dan Boone
gardener
Posts: 3545
Location: Central Oklahoma (zone 7a)
1259
forest garden trees woodworking
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Run number 4!  This was the the last pass (for now) for the 1950s pruners; they are now clean enough that I think it's worth taking them apart and running the two halves separately, but I haven't disassembled them yet.  They turn out to be "Briar Edge" brand, model S8, apparently dating to the 1950s or 1960s.  Briar Edge, near as I can tell, was a division or brand of the venerable American tool company Ames True Temper.

It's always a pleasure when random dirty metal comes out of the tumbler and I discover that it's pretty brass or bronze.  I guess I knew that the wing nuts from the ancient and horribly corroded aluminum pressure canner that I turned into a garden pot could not possibly be steel; the steel parts (like the brackets that held the wooden handles) were just a falling-to-pieces mess of rust.  But I did not think about it, just threw the wingnuts into the goodie bin.  

I cannot shake the feeling that I'm being abusive when I throw edged tools (chisels, carpet knife) and antique wooden-handled stuff like the screwdrivers into this process.  But honestly I am awash in the stuff and it's mostly not worth the time it would take to clean gently and individually.  A wood chisel that's shedding oxidized plastic whenever you touch it is, truly, garbage; after a pass through the tumbler it's at least clean garbage, allowing me to check markings, decide whether it's worth touching up the blade on the shop grinder, and so forth.  Most of the wooden stuff comes through surprisingly well, and (once clean and dry) seems worth oiling with linseed oil and keeping.

old-hardware-run-4-before.jpg
Before the fourth run in the vibratory tumbler
Before the fourth run in the vibratory tumbler
old-hardware-run-4-after.jpg
After the fourth run in the vibratory tumbler
After the fourth run in the vibratory tumbler
pruners-1.jpg
closeup of the pruners
closeup of the pruners
pruners-2.jpg
other side of the pruners
other side of the pruners
pruners-3.jpg
writing on the pruners 'Briar Edge'
writing on the pruners 'Briar Edge'
 
Dan Boone
gardener
Posts: 3545
Location: Central Oklahoma (zone 7a)
1259
forest garden trees woodworking
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Not many repeat customers in run 5, just a few of the corroded wrenches and those die-hard square nuts, which I am really just using as a sort of experiment on how really old metal performs after numerous runs.  (If there's a practical use for 100-year-old square nuts, I haven't thought of it yet.)  

I continue to be impressed by how well the nastiest threaded hardware cleans up, although I am discovering that whomever created these collections was fond of putting bolts with boogered threads back in the bin.  Testing the threads on cleaned-up bolts has been added to the workflow process.  I don't own a set of dies for repairing dinged threads, but I'm sure some dies will turn up in the bottom of a rusty toolbox one of these days.  

The (galvanized?) pullies and cable clamps also clean up better than expectations.  I honestly expected the ancient zinc canning jar lid to be destroyed, but it cleaned up decently.  I may put it through another run sometime when I'm doing more aluminum and soft metals.  

old-hardware-run-5-before.jpg
before the fifth run
before the fifth run
old-hardware-run-5-after.jpg
after the fifth run
after the fifth run
 
Dan Boone
gardener
Posts: 3545
Location: Central Oklahoma (zone 7a)
1259
forest garden trees woodworking
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This sixth run was yesterday, so I won't spam this thread again for awhile.  (I do honestly suspect I'm the only person crazy enough to find this interesting.)  

I feel like maybe the gross rust didn't get cut so well in this run.  Maybe my media is getting all the rough edges worn off and I need to add some sharper media.  Or possibly it's just that the stuff in this run was extra rusty.  Normally I wouldn't bother with rusty nails but this handful was particularly uniform and big enough to be expensive.  Anyway I feel that most of this run could use another couple of hours, so the next run will probably have most of these items in it.

All forty of those rusty sockets (and the nails) were in a container I bought for a dollar.  I'll get some value out one way or another!

old-hardware-run-six-before.jpg
before run six
before run six
old-hardware-run-six-after.jpg
after run six
after run six
 
steward & bricolagier
Posts: 14680
Location: SW Missouri
10143
2
goat cat fungi books chicken earthworks food preservation cooking building homestead ungarbage
  • Likes 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I just started a new thread on Dyeing fabric with rusty metal
Which looks to ME like function stacking! Got rust, make pretty patterned fabric with it before you clean it!!
 
Everybody! Do the Funky Monkey! Like this tiny ad!
Announcing The World's Largest Collection of 16,000 Woodworking Plans
https://woodworking-plans
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic