Marla Kacey wrote:Watch the video at the link. It looks like vegetation does not interfere. I may be wrong, though.
Are you going to clear all the trees? Or leave some for wild area, wind break, animal habitat, etc?
For now, clearing young scrub trees (hemlocks, norway maples), keeping established value trees (oaks, maples, white pine), just so I can wrap my brain around the topography. So, not really clearing, but trying to get some sight lines longer than 20 ft, and breaks in the canopy where I'm working. It's just so dense I'm finding it impossible to plan...
I figured the vegetation wasn't completely impeding the data collection, but wondered if, theoretically, bare land has more accurate info than forested land. New to this!
K