posted 14 years ago
In a battle it is always good to prepare for what you can do three months from now, in case things go on longer then you expected them to. I would think it was as well to try to grow lots of fugal mats for the oil spill as possible and if they aren't needed well a lot of people wil know how to make them, if i understood right they are what is needed for soil with all types of herbicide and pesticide in it. The minute I have the money to buy the wood chips or saw dust or straw on which they can feed to spread on the land I want cured, I will buy spent oyster mushroom substrate or make fungal mats to inoculate the material with and try to better the soil on the bit of garden some crazy neighbor put herbicide on.
It is worth growing fungal mats for the oil that gets carried high up beyond the beaches the normal tide line where maybe there is not too much salt.
If oyster mushrooms, ostreatus pleurotus fungi, break down petrol because hydrocarbon is made up of the same molecules as their normal food carbohydrates, so they can break down the bonds between hydrogen and carbon atoms, then they would not be the only living organisms with that could break down hydrocarbons.
Hydrocarbons are more corrosive than carbohydrate, as I see it, I am not a scientist and petroleum having a low boiling point gives off lots of gases, fungi will have to be able to put up with the presence of hydrocarbons and their gases if they are to feast on them. In order to secrete digestive juices acids and enzymes on to the oil and take up the atoms they need from the resulting heap of broken down hydro carbon molecules. So you need living organisms that don't mind being in contact with the oil if you are to find things that will eat it and that does not sound so easy. I wonder how oyster mushrooms survive it.
If BP had pulled out all the stops they would have made the second bell shape to lower over the leaking pipe and a big one, at the same time as the first one, they would have made a lot of back up possibilities to use if the first did not work with a lot of workers all at the same time. They are not like us they are a big company they can bring in a lot of people and the situation is such that there is too much of a hurry for them to wait to see if the first thing works before getting to work on the back up possibilities.
It must be easier to put down a bigger bell than the one they made, on top of the jet of oil, if the escaping jet of oil is not too confined it won’t push the bell placed over it over, the out flow will have less push in a bigger space.
They could make a lot of other things. a tube down which to pour stones and concrete cover the leak. Would the petrol then seep into the sand and get out into the ocean underneath the rubble and the concrete that had been poured on top of it? They should put down a concrete floor first and then throw concrete on it. Are they thinking big enough?
There was a time when i would not have offered crazy ideas but when you are already a long way into adult life, you learn that sometimes even professional people have not even thought of the most obvious and it is always worth putting out stupid and unprofessional ideas, you never know what will work.
If Paul Stamets had not been willing to do way out things he would not have tried to feed fungi on petrol. Agri rose macaskie.