Thomas - thanks for the comments. I probably ended up using closer to two bags of fire clay as well, and most of the 4 cf bg of perlite. I ended up not using any fiberglass, and just a 1/2 gallon tub of furnace cement.
I get your point about wishing to have used more furnace cement, and I've seen places where my core is crumbling and brittle. The trick I did that I'm really happy with how it's working out is using pieces of split fire brick to form the feed tube. I had seen both Matt's video and your posts and I didn't want to have to patch that area again and again, so it seemed like a hybrid idea could work really well. Matt wrote back afterwards saying it doesn't work because the core dries and pulls away from the fire bricks, but my core is as dry as it's gonna get and there are just tiny gaps around the bricks. I had way bigger problems with drying cracks in general than I did around the fire bricks. The fire bricks form a perfect feed tube, I can jam stuff in, break branches as I put them in and not worry at all about damaging the feed tube. You can see some tiny gaps in the picture at the bottom, but nothing that seems like a problem.
The other piece I saw somewhere (I can't remember the thread), the person made a metal insert for their feedtube that both protected the feedtube from wear and tear, and, because most of the metal was outside and exposed, it served to keep the feedtube cooler which helped cut down on wood gassifying at the top of the feed tube rather than down inside the burn tunnel. I'm not a welder and couldn't easily see how to incorporate that into my design, so for now, I'm happy with my fire brick lined feed tube.
I read about your future plans for the Walker style poured core for your studio, so here's my thought for my next project. What about a hybrid core? The problem with poured cores is they're too brittle and require a lot of maintenance. The problem with a fire brick core is they take a while to heat up and even when they do, they dissipate significant heat from the fire. What about a hybrid core that gives the best of both? I'm thinking to follow the rough plans for a poured core, making an outer box and an inner form. I'm thinking to use 10-1 perlite/clay for the covering, mainly because I want serious insulation. The essence of the core is made of split fire bricks. In the bottom of the box I'll put 3" of the 10-1 perlite clay to form the insulative bottom of the core. Then I'll lay six split fire bricks sideways, side to side (6 x 4.5" = 27" length). I'll set the core form on top of the fire bricks, and place fire bricks around the form. There will need to be some brick cutting depending on the size core you want, but cutting bricks with an angle grinder has been pretty easy and cutting split bricks isn't bad at all. The sides of the core, top, feed tube, burn tube and riser are all formed out of the split fire bricks. They rest against the wood form to hold them in place and the 10-1 perlite/clay mix is packed around. If you want to go for perfection, I'd use a fire caulk to help seat the bricks so there are no gaps and the core is air tight and solid.
So now you have two great attributes for your core. First, it's as strong as fire brick, so no worries about abrasion, wear and tear or needing to patch it after a few weeks use. Second, the split bricks will take some time to heat up, but now, the majority of the core is much more insulative than Matt's core, and my guess is it will heat quickly and once it gets hot, it will do a much better job at redirecting all the heat from the fire back into the fire, better than a fire brick core or Matt's poured core. 1-1 perlite/clay is too much mass and too much possibility for heat transfer. Another piece I wondered about, that it might actually be good to have a certain amount of mass that gets hot in the core. When I feed my fire, I often don't get back to it quickly
enough to put in new wood before the last bit of wood has gone to embers or is just about there. Restarting the fire again and again is a pain. But, when the core is hot, most of the time, I just add a few bits of
kindling and in a minute or so, it relights and is good to go again. The split firebrick would retain enough heat to help with relights and finishing burns yet be significantly less mass than a full fire brick core. The extra insulation around the fire brick will help it heat faster and once it gets hot, redirect much more of its heat back into the fire.
The bummer for me is, I don't have any place where I need another heater
I live in Northern California and it's been 70 degrees during the day for most of February. It gets down to the 40's at night, so I do heat my
greenhouse, and we do heat our house, but my wife isn't a big fan of this project, so I have a design in search of a need