Michelle Bisson wrote:A couple of the negatives of this technique is that one may say that it is un natural looking and the new branches may be more fragile to break at the point of where it was pollard.
Here in the Himalayas, willows are one of the few types of tree grown, and they are always pollarded. At our school, I insisted that we keep one line of willows tall and natural, with space underneath, because I thought it looked nicer. Every older man who happened into our campus would say "Is there some reason you're not taking care of those trees?" or "Those trees need to be taken care of. You'll see, they'll do much better if you pollard them." For the first few years we liked them, as they created open space with shade. But after about 10 years, I started to see the point those guys had always been making.
:
-- The unpollarded willows drop twigs all summer long. I guess it's it's a propagation strategy. Pollarded trees drop no debris.
-- Unpollarded willows get scraggly and the shade becomes dappled. The pollarded trees make a compact canopy with deep shade.
-- The branches are weak on some varieties and if you try to hang something on them or climb, they break. Pollarded trees produce tough strong straight sticks.
-- The trunks of pollarded trees grew thicker than unpollarded ones. The amount of biomass, wood and leaves produced annually is much more on the pollarded trees.
When we finally pollarded them when they were like 15 years old and 40 feet tall, they produced a good big bunch of sprouts that grew into straight sticks (though I've read that you shouldn't pollard a big natural formed tree)..