Hi Chad,
I gave the linked site a quick scan, and as soon as I saw straw bale insulation and then a foam, which is a non-permeable or low permeable layer in the matrix, I don't give the long term durability of the structure much hope.
Architecture in general actually needs to be permeable (or breath as many describe it) and the entire concept of "air tight" buildings is just that...a concept. Its track record is less than 50 years old and the preliminary evidence that many us are seeing is it doesn't work. It has never worked with natural building materials in any example I have ever gotten to see forensically.
In my
experience and view...a wall with the following design matrix...
5/16-inch thick, textured, painted, fiber cement siding, screwed into flat-faced 2x4's at a 24-inch spacing, directly touching side-stacked straw bales, with a thickness of 14 inches, directly against 1/2" sheets of foil-faced foam insulation (with the inner face foil-taped to make a vapor barrier), touching flat-faced 2x4's at a 24-inch spacing, directly touching 1/2-inch gypsum wallboard, covered with a 1/16-inch layer of joint compound, textured with a rubber roller, and painted with a zero V.O.C. latex paint.
...is destine to have issues over time. The interstitial zones of these walls become unobservable, and inevitably have moisture buildup do to restricted permeability by all the non-breathable layers. In this case moisture, during certain times of the year, will move into the SB and not be able to migrate effectively
enough to mitigate the issues associated with high moisture content in walls...like molds and decay. Also, any system that is meant to "stop" moisture from moving (like the foam) never achieves that goal...It only slows the process way, way down, and therein lies the problem. If the builders had at least left a 30mm air gap between the SB and the foam, it may have lessened the evidable moisture build up. To make issues even worse...a modern latex paint is used which is never as permeable as traditional paints and never as permeable as manufacture claim.
Overall, many of these "new age" types of structures, built in this fashion, may last decades without noticeable issue. The questions is what they will look like (or be like) in a generation or two (i.e. couple hundred years)...This the real issue. I still don't understand why so many builders insist on ignoring good practices in means, methods and materials, with long proven records to instead experiment with "concepts." I am all for experimentation and testing concepts...however, when I build something to live in or for a client...I want as many aspects of the build as possible to be fully understood and with the longest histories of empirical knowledge backing it up. Architecture is to costly in time and money to "experiment with." I hope some of the "new concepts" prove to be worthwhile...Thus far in my experience few (if any?) have...
Regards,
j