posted 3 years ago
I'm going full speed ahead making plans to expand my hugel operation at my place. My ground is flat as a pancake. I've been running a test hugel mound for a couple years now, and i'm sold on the concept. Now it's time to scale up in a big way, but with one big modification. I wanted to run that by this group for feedback.
Instead of building a hugel mound, I am planning to make a hugel trench. I've got access to heavy equipment and endless supplies of wood. My experience with the above ground hoog was not good in the drought this past year. I am water challenged at my site, so watering is out of the question. Then it hit me. Why don't I just go below ground instead of above ground?
I plan to source some large logs from my woods and use them as raised bed borders. From the outside looking in, they'll look like simple raised beds, maybe 8-10" above the soil surface. But below it, I'd like to go 5' deep and backfill with as much wood/brush/stumps I can get my hands on. I'm not rich in topsoil either, but I've got enough piled up I can give myself maybe 6-8" to begin with, and lots of wood chips to boot.
So, I'm gonna bury my wood instead of mound it up, to outlast the drought. What says the community?