posted 3 years ago
When I think of reducing agents the first thing that comes to mind is vitamin C. While I get that the goal is to have healthy soil that oscillates between being a reducing environment and an oxidizing one, foliar feeding of minerals was discussed in the video as a temporary fix for nutrient availability issues due to soil being overly oxidizing.
But what if you just watered in an ascorbic acid / potassium ascorbate solution (adjusted to appropriate pH)? Seems like that might be easier and cheaper than foliar feeding with minerals. *
Has this been studied?
* I'm not against foliar feeding with minerals, in fact I really like the idea - though as yet I've no direct experience (tomorrow I will try it myself for treating blossom end rot). I have suggested to the void of Twitter (no responses, no likes) foliar feeding of rice with molybdenum to try to reduce arsenic uptake into the grain. Don't know if it would work but it would be great if it did since in people with controlled Celiac (on GF diet, low tTG IgA titre), whole grain consumption is associated with an increase in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N:L), meaning higher levels of inflammation. This is opposite of what one would expect; I think it is likely the culprit is higher arsenic intake from whole grain rice since the GF diet tends to be high in rice if it contains grains at all (some opt for low carb or just eat tubers and fruits to be safe). High N:L is associated with poor health outcomes (& maybe not so coincidentally has to do with redox imbalance); lowering arsenic levels in rice would benefit the whole population.