Hugo Morvan wrote:Leaves me wondering which willow variety they speak of and which oak particularly.
I also wondered the same. My suspicion is that they lumped anything in the
Salix genus together as "Willow" and both our native oaks (
Quercus robur and
Q. petraea) as "Oak". It would be helpful to know, though!
We have a mixture of willows (
S. caprea,
S. cinerea and hybrids, along with planted
S. viminalis and
S. fragilis) so I'm comfortable that they are supporting a good cross-section of those insects. Our oaks, to my knowledge, are all Sessile Oak (
Q. petraea) and I have no idea how that compares to the English Oak.
The hedgerow scheme that you mentioned is interesting. There is a lot of conversation in the conservation community (hah!) about hedgerows acting like "wildlife corridors" and effectively connecting areas of smaller woodland into a larger, more resilient one. You may be aware that species require a minimum viable population size (= area of habitat) in order to cope with freak weather events, drought, disease, etc. The effect of connecting areas of woodland habitat using hedgerow corridors facilitates larger population sizes as well as maximising the amount of 'edge' that the woodland has.
Timothy Norton wrote:I always tend to focus on the the 'bad' bugs when it comes to specific trees.
That's an easy trap! I wonder if our language surrounding 'bugs' makes it easier to think of pests? 'Bugs' definitely brings to mind pests, parasites or 'creepy crawlies' - perhaps a word like 'invertebrates' is more neutral.
Another thought is that 'bad' bugs for one tree might be the food of 'good' bugs for another. My view is that more diversity is always better; sure there are more pest species but there tend to be more predators for them too. It's only in really unbalanced ecosystems, where a few species dominate, that issues seem to arise.
If you happen across any good literature, do post them for us to read!