posted 12 years ago
Allen's idea of using plastics as a feedstock to a gasifier, etc., is certainly a better option than burning piles of trash in the open. However, it addresses a different problem than the one Ryan was trying to solve, which was to reduce the toxic pollution resulting from all the burning plastic. It's unlikely that this can be achieved with a gasifier setup, where combustion is incomplete by design. Even feeding wood into a gasifier results in many toxins being produced. With plastics in the feedstock, you would probably end up with many polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other persistent organic polutants in the ash, in the various distilates and in the resulting gas or exhaust, so you have not really solved the polution problem, or even reduced it in a meaningful way.
I think investigating the rocket stove approach is more likely to bear fruit. The higher your flue temperature, the better, so make sure the chimney is high and well insulated. Accumulate materials for long burns rather than doing short burns on demand. Start each burn with wood fuel and do not introduce plastics until the system has had a chance to heat up thoroughly and is burning clean and hot. Even with these measures, the combustion gas temperature will not approach that in a commercial waste-to-energy incinerator -- typically 2200 deg. F or higher for a high temperature incinerator. It may, however, be hot enough to improve substantially over the status quo in Jakarta.
Mike
http://tenderfootfarmer.ca