Ah, but you can't edit them once someone has replied.
And yes you should be able to edit ALWAYS, like you said, maybe you just want to correct an error. How is it helpful to anyone to leave spelling errors up or bad links?
Well I'll be. I always thought people
could go back and edit! Well, that's a bummer. You taught me something new about permies.com at least!
I understand that if someone makes a mistake and intentionally posts information like their SSN/bank account/credit card detail, etc., that the lack of being able to edit could destroy them. I hope individuals don't post stuff like that, but I'm sure the staff would work with them to help remove it, even if they are just volunteers. Better to just not post any such PII on any forum in the first place, I think.
Personally, I'll keep using permies.com, though. Apparently after +130 posts I have just never needed the (currently unavailable) go back and edit feature. So it hasn't been important to me.
I've only used or needed these features, instead:
1)
The 'Report' feature: If anyone says something inappropriate or hurtful or against the be nice policy, that person can try "reporting" the post, and then the inappropriate comment can likely be deleted. But if someone is, God-forbid, stalking someone else, I think the victim needs to call the
local police ASAP, as I'm pretty sure stalking is illegal in most places.
2)
The 'Preview' feature: Bad links are just that. Bad. Spelling errors are just that. Errors. Fortunately, it is possible to proofread several times to catch one's own mistakes. I use a desktop or laptop browser on permies.com instead of a mobile device. Then when replying in the white pane at the bottom of the screen, any spelling typos will often have a fun red squiggly line under them. So there is no need to break out a word processor. Then, prior to hitting 'Submit', I hit 'Preview' and then it's easier to see how the post will look. At that point I like to test any URL links I've posted, and look for stray marks. That catches most of my errors. But hey, something will always be wrong on the internet, right?
3)
The 'Wiki' feature: If I know that I'm going to post something that will change a bunch, I just use the "wiki" feature, like this
wiki over here. On a desktop/laptop, after starting a new thread, the option is at the bottom of the screen next to 'Attachments'.
4)
The 'name change' feature: As previously mentioned. Online, nobody really knows who you are. They don't know if you are a man or a woman, what country you live in, how many German Shepherds or shotguns you own, etc..., only what you provide. I use a nice strong name personally. Maybe change your name to "Chuck". Nobody wants to mess with a guy named "Chuck", too much round-house kick potential. Maybe "Sampson" for the last name. Chuck Sampson. That's a forum name!
5)
The 'Internet is forever' feature: Because of sites like "archive.org" and big governments, screenshots, web crawlers, data-harvesting corporations, etc. it's not beyond reason that
everything posted online may be stored permanently, even if it is later "edited" or "deleted". It's there somewhere. Assume this feature is in use, everywhere. Even if you don't hit "enter" or submit. Assume people can read what you are typing and thinking in real time...because...yes.
6)
The free market: There are tons of other real estate and social networking options which may best for doing real estate things or safely sharing PII. But there is only one permies.com.
Survivalrealty.com
blackriflerealestate.com/
Landandfarm.com
Landwatch.com
Homesandland.com
Realtor.com
Trulia
Zillow...
7)
The 'Purple Mooseage' feature: Private-ish messaging.
8)
The big fat check in the mail to Paul Wheaton to tell him how to change his creation, feature: I'm joking here. I obviously made this feature up. But I paid exactly €0 for the opportunity to use this site. Zero euros. Can't beat the price! The site only takes information or value (or misinformation or negative value) if I put it out there freely. Maybe the cost of this 'editing' and 'deleting' feature is worth $100 to you, and €5 to me? Would you or I write him a check for $100 or €5 to change his site? That's possible. But what if, for reasons unknown to us, it is worth $1,000,000 in benefits to Paul? Should he change his site for our sake at low or no cost, at his loss of happiness? Creators need
freedom to create curiosities.
Something will always be wrong on the Internet.