Consider that Geoff has offered his knowledge as 'the only answer' to global climate collapse. If you had 'the only answer' to global climate collapse, would you charge $1,000 for someone to learn about it, or would you offer it--as many musicians and artists do now--on a sliding scale or on donation? Let the rich West pay for it, let the people who really need it attend for free. Who is to say that he's capping it at 1000ish students, for that matter? If you were to offer it for $1000, would you really turn away ten people who wanted to pay? Really? Capitalist?
Geoff talks about this very thing in the course in regards to PRI'S "Master Plan". They get called all over the world to consult and work on aid projects, most often with the UN and NGO's. The funding for these projects is typically between 3-5 years. After 5 years, a food forest is not mature, but it is productive and demonstrably contributing to healing the land and helping people to become self sufficient. What I can remember from the video that I watched last Saturday (I'll be reviewing it again this weekend) is that Geoff's model in those aid situations is to set up a demonstration site within the first years when they are being funded. They then offer training to the local's free of charge in the form of a PDC. Locals make up half of the class, the other half being internationals who are paying to be there. This serves to fund the project beyond the 3-5 years so that they don't have to pack up and leave town after the money stops flowing in from the aid organization (like what happened with his first project in Jordan).
What also happens is that the Internationals want to be there and want the information. They are enthusiastic and ask lots of questions. Locals who see this take the information more seriously because it's obviously something that people from the west find very valuable. This way the locals become more enthusiastic themselves and are more eager to put the principles into practice.
That sounds to me to be a pretty solid model. Westerners can get experience and training on some of the most difficult sites on the planet, as well as contributing to global aid in a way that is not just "give a man a fish" .... I was asked a few weeks ago to sponsor a child through an aid organization and they showed me the typical project and community setup that they implement. I want to help more than anything, but the widely accepted model of aid that is implemented worldwide is so fundamentally flawed in that we are treating the symptoms. The people are hungry, so we give them food. They have no home, so we build them a house. These are all very noble things, but without addressing the issues that caused them to be hungry and homeless, how can we expect the problem to go away? I found myself wishing that these aid organizations would base their projects on permaculture. It's great that they built a well, it would be better if they were teaching how to harvest and store water. It's for this reason that I am thrilled to be supporting PRI's efforts as they "teach a man to fish".
Geoff is presenting Permaculture as "the only answer" to climate change not because he has a narrow view, but because Permaculture has such a wide scope. He tells the story of how he was brought in on a project along with other experts who practice various methods of land restoration to give their ideas on how they would go about working with the piece of land. He was hired over the others not because Permaculture was presented as "the way" but because he said all the other methods the other consultants were presenting as "the way" would indeed work. He describes Permaculture not as a single set of methods but as a wardrobe that contains many different coats. Each coat is a different method or technique, some coats you wear more often, some only occasionally, and some not at all depending on your climate or preference. Geoff's favorite coats may be different than your favorites, but they all fit into the same wardrobe that is permaculture. Anything that cares for the earth, cares for people and returns surplus fits into Permaculture. If something contributes to our permanence on this planet, is that not by definition a part of Permaculture? He describes Permaculture as inclusive in techniques, not exclusive.
All this talk about Geoff not needing a million dollars is rather ignorant. Ignorant of the fact that there are a lot more people behind this than Geoff, and that a million dollars really does not go very far in the world these days, especially when you are running and expanding an international organization. We can criticize the current economic system and wish it be different all we want, but reality, here, now is that money is what it takes to make things happen. The work Geoff does with that money helps to reduce people's dependence upon it. Is money and marketing evil? If so, it is a necessary evil to GET THE KNOWLEDGE OUT THERE.
When a value is assigned to something, people value it. If a hard sell tactic is what it takes to get people signed up who otherwise would not sign up, then what's the problem? More people's brains are infected with Permaculture. Many of you know permaculture instructors or practitioners in your own area, or have your own groups or clubs, and have a patch of dirt to play with. You don't see the value, and in your situation I can understand there is no value as you can get what knowledge you need for free through conversation or experimentation. For those of us who are isolated from like minded people, are not on land and have the money to take the course, this is a perfect match. This will likely lead to people having more confidence to take the plunge and change their lives. I really can't see how that would be bad, especially not if this can be amplified by teaching over a thousand people in a matter of months. If anything, we need more people than just Geoff Lawton doing this (online Wofati Design Certification anyone?). In fact, I seem to remember a certain rotund man in overalls releasing a rocket mass heater course on a 4 DVD set, in a format not so different from Geoff Lawton's, yet I didn't hear so many people complaining about Paul being a crook and a disappointment. I even recall a similar hard sell in that the dvd's may not be sold after the kickstarter so get them now. I do remember Paul raising something like $90k in what, 18 days? Now all I read are congratulations on getting his land and nothing but support for now being able to realize his dreams and further the spread and vindication of Permaculture. Nowhere have I read "I hate Paul's guts now". Mind you, this is Paul's website and likely nobody has the balls to say it here, but Geoff doesn't come by often enough to defend himself.
People who cannot commit the time to attending a workshop or course, yet value the material presented, are more than willing to pay for a video format. Who are we to tell them there is no value when without that format they would not have the chance to learn. There is clearly a demand or else Geoff would not be offering this. If you don't want to participate in that format, you really don't have to, but you may want to consider that Geoff has probably been asked for years to do this by people around the world. Those people are getting what they wanted and Geoff is no monster for providing it.