Figure I'll pop in and try to help a little since it's RMH season and it's forefront in my mind anyway
First, I'll second what Allen said about putting it outside. I built our beautiful, super efficient and hard working RMH out in our "sunroom" (a cheapo diy, plastic "half hoop house" attached to the south side of the camper we stay in while working toward our cabin) and the thing is such a pain in the side to deal with now. We don't really have a choice in the matter, but if you do, just don't
Cooler intake air will cool your combustion some (with air below freezing doing so pretty significantly). That's just the start of it, though. Because it wont be "handy", you're likely to have more issues with the wood getting stuck as it feeds itself into the burn and causing you to lose your efficiency...these guys do definitely require LOTS of fiddling to keep things burning efficiently. I wouldn't mind one bit fiddling with something that's right there, but with the feed tube out of sight (and earshot), it's easy to not realize when that throaty, rockety goodness is less than ideal ... before you know it, either the thing is smoking back because wood fell in to the burn tunnel, blocking flow, or you're hanging over the thing like you're praying to the ol' porcelain goddess, dizzying yourself as you blow on what coals are left in an attempt to suss some life back into that incredible burn you had just moments before. Needless and super annoying to say the least
We HAD to put our entire system "outside" in that sunroom (a camper trailer doesn't work well with a RMH no matter how creative you get). That means we miss out on tons of the RMH benefits. We also have to run the thing 5x more than we would otherwise need to, keeping it going for sometimes 12-14 hours on those really frigid, subzero nights here in central Maine. That also means we burn tons of wood compared, a waste of resources, and have to stay up all night when it's really cold in order to feed and tend the beast. I absolutely love the RMH, but absolutely hate that it's "out there".
Put that baby inside, *in its entirety*, if you can possibly find the space ... it will save you a million and one headaches down the road and allow you to love that beast the way I wish I could.
As for attempting a hydronic system, the RMH is definitely not ideal for such application. Best to stick to the original, proven techniques with these guys, especially on your first build. One little miscalculation, clog or sharp bend causing an air lock and you'll have the potential for a steam explosion. If you want something for hydronic heating, look into methane digestion and those small "on-demand" propane water
heaters for ideas. A RMH is a beast designed to work a specific way - deviating from this often results in total failure...when there's water in the mix, that failure could turn catastrophic
Any wood will burn in the RMH, even green/wet/rotted stuff. Ideal, though, is going to be dry hardwoods. Size of wood is going to be dependent on the size of your system as well. In our 8" beast, we burn wood ranging from 1" diameter round/unsplit pieces of poplar, alder and willow up to 6" split chunks of beech, birch and maple. In our new 4" RMH system, however, we're lucky to keep a 2" split piece of super dry fir lit long
enough to burn down on its own...most of the wood that goes in there needs to be 1/4" to 1/2" diameter. (that brings up another tip - go bigger if you can...easier to work with, more heat and less headaches with the larger systems)
The biggest issues with dimensional lumber will be 1) the "chimney effect" you get with straight/vertical pieces of wood sitting
side by side that create an interruption of flow, throwing smoke upward rather than sideways, and 2) pieces of wood creating a sort of "dam" that blocks flow of gasses into the burn tunnel. Burning dimensional lumber, even split down into smaller pieces, will require more fiddling to ensure things don't block up and cause smoking back. Of course, most of your dimensional lumber is going to be softwood as well (fir, pine, etc) and so wont deliver as much heat as, say, oak or beech or
black locust. If you have a little bit of space, I'd recommend growing fuel - black locust grows like a weed and coppices beautifully, allowing you to get a lot of hot/long burning fuel in short rotation cycles from a very small area.
As for longer run times, your best bet is larger diameter and harder fuel woods like osage orange and black locust. You can push it a little on length of fuel wood (we routinely get away with pieces as long as 3 feet) but expect more and more issues with pieces hanging up, falling over sideways, etc as you go longer. Thicker pieces in a larger system will last a good long while. This morning bottomed out at about -1*F and I fed our 8" a chunk of beech about 6" wide, 4" deep, 2 feet long around 5am. I happened to look out there at 7am and about 1/4 of that chunk was still burning happily.
As for heat risers, I tried a few different techniques over the past few years:
1) 8" inner metal stove pipe with clay/perlite mix and 12" surrounding metal stove pipe...this failed with the inner metal degrading and collapsing in, causing the system to block up
2) 8" inner metal stove pipe with clay/perlite/peat moss and 12" surrounding metal stove pipe...this failed as the peat moss burned out and the air pockets in the clay were too large/clay too crumbly and the system stopped being as rockety
3) 8" inner metal stove pipe with 2" ceramic fiber blanket wrap and 12" surrounding metal stove pipe...this failed as the inner metal collapsed in again like #1
4) 8" inner metal stove pipe with 1" ceramic fiber blanket wrap, soaked in clay slip to give it a little thermal mass, and another 1" ceramic fiber wrapped around that, in 12" metal surround ... works awesomely for a year now
The ceramic fiber blanket was a little pricey, but so worth it in the end. Also, I built my core using the old standard of regular clay bricks (not fire bricks) and perlite. I used the plan from the old Ianto Evans book. Including purchase of all new materials, total cost for my 8" system's core came to around $300 - that includes the fiber blanket, bricks, perlite, course sand and 8"/12" round metal heating duct (incredible how expensive those elbows and tees are!).
Figured with my personal experience living with one of these for the last few years as our primary heat source, I might be able to help at least a little. You'll love your RMH if you build one, regardless of where you put it, but be prepared to end up in a love/hate relationship if you put that feed outdoors or in any other harder to access place.
Steve Smyth wrote:Hey Everyone,
I have been lurking about for quite some time with great interest. I have been looking forward to warm weather so that I can start tinkering with my first RMH just for fun.
Well, that was the plan until I opened my electric bill the other day. This is our first winter in our new (to us) 340sq ft home and I knew our heating cost would be something to contend with but I did not expect almost $400 for a month!!
Now I am motivated to come up with a practical method of burning wood as efficiently as possible. The RMH concept looks great on the efficiency side but I am not certain how I can implement it practically.
Space is VERY limited and the layout is not flexible. I have an available "cubby" that is 42"w x 24" d x 44" t and is built of wood. I don't think that I can place the rocket stove in that space and I have some reservations about having the firebox of my first attempt at a homebuit wood stove inside my living space.
Q: Is it practical to place the burn chamber etc outside and duct the heat inside? How about heating water with the stove and using some sort of hydronic solution inside?
Q: Are lumber (2x4) scraps a reasonable fuel? Any issues? I have easy access to a quantity of this.
Q: Has anyone come up with any sort of feed system that would keep the heater fueled for several hours?
Q: I see that metal is not the ideal material to line the firebox/chimney. How about using a cardboard (sonotube) liner as a form for fire clay? It would be sacrificial and burn out during my first burns.
I am sure that I will come up with a few more
Thanks for your assistance.
Steve