posted 10 years ago
> [presently] ... low on leadershiop
Paul
Reading this just a couple minutes after sitting down and signing on to permies to see the latest - ie. while I was still finding a place to put the beer and not thinking anything particular, empty open mind - it flashed clearly (FWIW) that I didn't know what you meant. There seem several possibilities:
1) need expert knowledge/experience in particular areas to know the issue, know the options/methods, make plans to address specific problems, maybe tell people what needs doing. But not necessarily _decide_ anything.
2) shepard newbies, temps, transients, wannabees, potentials... ie. gappers: from dawn til dusk (not being derogatory here either - it's a need); seeing they find a (acceptable adequate) spot to sleep; that they get some food and make sure they know how to do it themselves; get up in the morning; go somewhere useful or at least bother somebody who can take it; listen to issues; speak to the whole group or at least see _somebody_ does once a day to maintain proper attitude, team spirit and impart expectations; Something like office manager, no strategic decisions, just keep the machine greased, fueled, fix the occasional flat and watch the gauges.
3) Or. Somebody that you might be willing to give control of specific areas/problems. They would go get resources (gappers as well as tools, etc) schedule heavy equipment, make _the_ plan, set goals, et al. Now _that's_ a serious position and I can't see how it just shows up. It takes a while for they and you to see a fit.
4) A "rainmaker". Somebody who has some magic and is ready and willing to use it. Steps in, grabs resources and makes things happen, one way or another, in a way that can be said to move the group forward. Sometimes they are good guys, sometimes not. Self starters who come w/their own opinions, habits,. goals, even sometimes support staff.
My .02 here is just to say that "leadership" the word seems nebulous here, a catch-all. Imparts very little actual info. And maybe that's OK. Maybe also if you _do_ have some clearly defined pieces under the "leadership" umbrella that you can break break out in a more cut/dried format then persons might see a light bult, recognize _their_ slot and be able to move on a decision. I guess an example of what I mean would be the kitchen boss. Clear package, a particular job that some people actually know and know they know; also a very important position that requires a lot of a person. That is an attractive package. Few people can actually fill those shoes, but there are some and the chance to practice their skills is a big plus.
Well, not sure if I added much here, but maybe a little. And the dinner bell has run.
Regards
Rufus