Benjamin Dinkel wrote:Hey Dave,
what is it that you're trying to learn?
There's a lot of different "masonry" style heating systems in the world. The goal always being to extract most of the heat from the exhaust gases.
To me the RMH is just the modern, more low tech take on that. The key being a complete combustion and a later heat extraction.
A lot of contraptions and inventions I see don't have that in mind and extract heat from incomplete combustion, which leads to creosote and potential disaster.
In many ways it's exploratory. Not knowing them, I'm wondering if there is anything novel (to me) that they're doing. A RMH is freaky efficient, but I'm always curious about angles for improvements.
My other thought is one of adoption. If these models have some level of adoption and acceptance, is there something to be learned there. In this case, my guess is around cultural heritage and beauty, but it is still another angle to consider.