Admittedly, my understanding of the various "rocket" technologies is lacking, but it seems to me that each solution (
rocket stove and rocket mass heater) is designed for a very specific application, and neither is ideal for use as an oven.
I have build several rocket stoves, of varying effectiveness. (To my way of thinking) The design and purpose of a
rocket stove is to produce a substantial amount of heat in a very small area, specifically for cooking food by frying or boiling. The temperature tends to be quite a bit higher that what one might use an oven for...at best a rocket stove might be used to simulate the broiler function of an oven?
Rocket mass heaters, from what I have read and seen in videos, are designed to warm a large mass to a safe temperature that is suitable for providing heat and comfort to a living space. While internal temperatures can get quite warm, the majority of a
rocket mass heater does not achieve a high
enough temperature, for a long enough period of time, to be suitable for most traditional "oven" functions.
The limiting factor for both rocket stoves and rocket mass
heaters is that they create quite high temperatures in a relatively quick burn cycle, not more moderate temperatures for a long period of time. I'm sure either could be used to function as an oven, by adding fuel over a longer period of time than you normally would, and with the right types of convection or heat regulation. However, maintaining an even temperature of say, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 30, 60, 90 minutes or longer, is not something that seems to be easy to achieve with either of the "rocket" solutions.
Is there something I'm unaware of or are rocket-type stoves/heater simply not well-suited for traditional oven cooking?