Fair enough, I suppose it is given it looks at improving law(s).
I considered it fair game given chapter 14 of "the manual" and it being focussed on improving our collective communities
I thought it might be acceptable as I would be surprised if anyone in this forum would find the content unreasonable, along with it being a call for collaboration and consensus, not dogma..
But if this is your final decision, I shall accept it resignedly.
Thank you for your reply.