I saw a lot of buildings like this before and during my career as a builder. This one looks like it was fashioned from materials found and on hand—rammed earth tires for footings, different kinds of roofing materials and windows, and different wall materials from straw bales to stones to cotton. As a small structure, it may have been exempt from structural review if building codes/permits are required in that area. And it may have been built without much awareness of then-current best construction practices for building with bales and framed roofs. This may not have mattered if its original function was a
chicken coop or garden shed or just a hands-on opportunity to learn about building an inexpensive
shelter with mostly natural, found, and low-cost materials.
I agree with the recommendations for larger roof overhangs. You don’t say where this building is, but clearly something has been eroding what looks like an exterior earth plaster (although I have seen crumbling lime and cement plasterers that look very similar). It may be that deep snow piled up at the building’s base (after sliding from the roof) contributed to this as well, and larger eves would help deposit snow further from the wall.
I also agree that without knowing more about the structure (post and beam or load-bearing?) it’s difficult to tell what’s going on, and what the failing exterior plaster might mean for the entire structure.
It looks like a charming, funky building that may be worth salvaging if you’re committed to making this a comfortable guest space. Or it could be a tear-down, with some of it salvaged for another building, and as Anne said, some of it composted. Start with evaluating the walls. If it’s a post-and-beam structure and the framing is in good shape you could lengthen the roof, replace any damaged bales, take care of the edge and flashing details, prep the walls for plaster, then apply a suitable plaster. If it’s load bearing and the bales are in bad shape....
If you decide to salvage this, a few other observations:
Window sills. One photo shows windows that might be set into floating window bucks (in a load bearing wall)...or they might be mounted to framing that extends from the sill plate to the top plate (what Cristobal called a “bond beam”). Either way, the bales below the windows were at one time protected by a plastered sill which has now eroded and possibly lead to some straw bales being damaged—hard to tell if the discoloration is mud or decomposed straw. I repaired a lot of these during remodels—turns out that plaster isn’t a particularly durable sill material if exposed to water. Moisture collecting on the sill soaks through the plaster into the bales below. Using 15 lb. building paper under the plaster would help prevent bale damage, but exposed building paper will also soon succumb to the forces of nature. A peel-and-stick membrane would be a better choice under a more durable projecting sill.
Current best practice today is to use a material like tile,
concrete, stone, or wood to direct water away from the area below windows; sloped sills
should project at least a few inches away from the wall so water drops hit the ground and not the wall.
Mesh/lath. I’m guessing that the “chicken wire” used on the bales was just that...chicken wire? Although this material was commonly used early in the straw bale building revival (late 1980s through 1990s), it’s not a great choice for the application. Chicken wire is made of a lighter gauge steel (usually 22 ga.) than stucco netting (usually 17 ga., 16 ga., or 14 ga.), and has a correspondingly thinner galvanic coating. This protective coating is sacrificial—the thinner it is, the less it protects the steel from repeated wettings. Over time it begins to rust. When I have torn into ten- and twenty-year old straw bale walls that used chicken wire for lath/mesh and had been subjected to seasonal wetting it just turned to dust—crumbled to the touch. Unless it was well attached through the bales it also caused heavy plasters to sag. Some builders report that using any steel mesh with clay plasters is asking for trouble since clay holds onto water and water corrodes steel, though I think that’s mostly a concern for exterior plasters that
experience seasonal wetting. I use polypropylene mesh (
deer fencing) when I use mesh at all on a clay plastered straw bale wall. The bale surface supplies sufficient lath or “tooth” for all plasters, and mesh of any kind is only needed when a straw bale wall plays a structural role like resisting in- or out-of-plane forces.
Today’s best practice is to use a mesh (and lath) suitable for the plaster type, and to attach it properly, according to its designed role in the wall.
If you want to get a really good look at what’s going on at the exterior straw bale wall surface you might want to remove all the plaster beneath the windows and what seem to be other areas impacted by moisture. Check the mesh condition (is it rusting through?), see if there’s water damage to the bales (surface, or through-and-through?), and look into replacing parts of or all of them. If it the mesh looks OK and it appears to be pinned or tied through (to the other side) and the bales have only minor deterioration at the surface, you might leave everything in place and re-coat the walls with new plaster—at least two coats. The first coat will have a lot of depth variation (typically ¼” – 1 ½”), and a lot of cracking because of it. The second one can be more uniformly thick (typically 3/8” – ½”), and will likely crack less if it’s a good mix, i.e., the right balance of binder, aggregate, and possibly fiber. If you want to use earth plaster you need larger roof overhangs if that’s the cause of the existing plaster erosion. Lime plasters will be more durable, but larger overhangs are still a good idea because lime plasters saturated by wind-driven rain (or rain/snow sitting on a plastered sill) will readily wick moisture in towards the bales.
Where plasters stop (edges). It looks like the exterior plasters didn’t have a defined stopping point—they just ran onto whatever the mesh was stapled to at the wall’s top, bottom, and around windows and doors. I saw a lot of this on straw bale structures built up through the early 2000s. The problem is that straw and wood have different thermal and moisture expansion-contraction characteristics. Wood moves with seasonal humidity changes, and a crack forms where plasters have been applied over wood unless a slip plane was inserted between the two. Or there’s A LOT of straw or other fiber in the plaster to supply tensile strength. Best practice is to use two-ply stucco paper there, lapping it several inches onto the bales to cover this junction, then installing a lath (burlap, fiberglass, metal) over the paper so plaster sticks to it. Without doing this the plaster over wood and near edges can crack and chip off. I also like to "capture" plaster fields with wood trim or metal screed and bead that protect the plaster edges and creates a very clear stopping point.
Window Flashing. The windows have no flashing (which can be challenging to apply over floating bucks in a load bearing wall). This is a peel-and-stick tape that seals the window mounting fin to framing, makes that joint more air-tight, and keeps water from getting behind the tape and into the window and wall, potentially ruining both. Best practice is to do this on every window and door, but with large enough roof overhangs you may not need to worry about this.
Roof flashing. One picture shows a small shed roof (what is sometimes called a “rooflet) positioned between a window and the ground. It’s not clear what this roof is protecting, but there’s no flashing between it and the wall it’s attached to. It looks like any water running down the window will drain down behind the roof—and remain on or in the wall. Best practice is to have wall-to-roof flashing here—a kind of “Z” flashing where one leg of the “Z” extends up the wall (beneath the plaster siding) and the other laps several inches over the gap at the roof/wall junction.
Ceiling insulation? It looks like the ceiling isn’t insulated, and that the rafters are possibly 2 x 6? It’s not clear if this was meant to be a conditioned space with a vented roof, but if the interior picture shows the underside of the metal roofing, there there’s no insulation in the space, so it probably gets cold in the winter, and warm in the summer? If it can be a vented roof, then the rafter depth minus at least 1” of vent space would offer about 4” for insulation...or around R-12 to R-15 for the rafter bays (thermal bridging at the rafters will drop the overall ceiling insulation to around R-10). R-39 is the minimum ceiling insulation requirement for temperate climates like where I live in S. Oregon, and that usually requires at least a 12” deep space for insulation. If you want to insulate the roof to make the space more comfortable, you’ll also need some kind of ceiling to keep inhabitants from breathing insulation particles that float down. 2 x 6s may not be able to carry these added loads across that span, and you’ll need to explore ways to re-do the way the roof/ceiling is supported. Know that whatever you do must carry the greater weight of insulation and a ceiling like sheetrock or T&G wood. If the latter, note that T&G isn’t air-tight. I have been in plenty of “mostly natural” straw bale buildings that used fiberglass or rockwool or denim insulation in the ceilings. Where only T&G separates the living space and the insulation, on windy days I have seen dust particles (bits of attic insulation) floating down through gaps in the T&G. Use some kind of air barrier there, or people will be breathing insulation dust. I like the looks of T&G but would use sheetrock under it because it’s a better air and fire barrier.
Good luck!
Jim Reiland
Many Hands Builders