Introduction:
This is more of a shower-thought than a proper
project. I am releasing it into the wild so that other hobbyists can play around with the idea as they see fit.
None of this is patented in any way, and all original ideas
should be considered open source/ creative commons/ public domain/ etc.
Though it isn’t a requirement, if you try this, I would appreciate it if you tell me about your findings. (Curiosity and all that.)
Explaining the Madness:
Hey folks, this is a picture of a jet engine.
[
cite: explainedstuff.com ]
Well, duh.
And here is a
rocket stove.
Also, duh.
But crazy mad scientist question of the day is, what if we combined them??
I think we need a little explanation of what’s going on here.
(1) since a jet engine can’t burn solids like
wood, we’ll go ahead and toast that up as normal in a
rocket stove. Also like a normal rocket stove (2) the now gassified output (mainly
“wood gas” along with other unburned material such as creosote) continues to burn. (3) The exhaust from this spins a set of blades, which turn a shaft (4) before exiting the “stove” as normal.
So far all we’ve really gained over a standard rocket stove is a spinning shaft. Now comes the magic. First, we drive a second fan (5) to suck more air in. This results in an even hotter, faster, and more complete burn. Finally (6), if we crudely photoshop a DC motor (aka, generator) onto that, we can get useable electricity! Hurray!
Interesting Bonus:
As more load is applied to the generator, it would slow the turbine, thus decreasing exhaust draft. With a little bit of electronical smarts, this could be regulated on purpose to extract the maximum amount of
energy from the system while maintaining flow.
Furthermore, since the generator can also be run as a motor, the electronics could
feed input power so that a proper draft is present during start-up. No more need to fiddle around with pre-warming and no more accidental back-burns filling the house with smoke.
Advantages:
1. More oxygen present would combust hydrocarbons even more thoroughly, and faster, than traditional stove.
2. Cheaper, and likely more efficient, conversion to electricity than
TEG devices.
3. Can probably be made from salvaged materials. (I picture, perhaps, an automotive starter motor as the generator?)
Disadvantages:
1. Wood burns differently than jet fuel, and designing a decent turbine may take a lot of engineering & experimentation. (Though even this may be more accessible than it sounds as hobby turbine implementations abound
online. [
example ])
2. Certainly more complex than a standard rocket stove.
3. Contains high heat, combustion gak, and moving parts and therefore will certainly require maintenance of some kind.
4. No idea what kind of noise this would make.
Final Note:
FYI, This is a re-post from my projects blog,
here.
Well, that's about it. Have a good day everybody!