Darren Halloran wrote:
1) Computer/ laptops or handwrite
2) Daytime or nighttime
3) time spent writing on amount of words or time in hours
4) get a publisher or self publish
5) locked away in a room or wander different places
6) timeframe to give your self or just open
7) ask opinions or just go for it
I have written two books, with two in the works in various stages of completion, and two more books I hope to write.
1) I handwrote my first book, but the rest have been on a computer or laptop. I prefer the latter...
2) I am a morning person, so my alone time is early in the morning. It is not ideal as sometimes it takes a cup of coffee, and an hour to get my brain really thinking, but I cannot think of a better time to write...for me.
3) I have heard people say they should be forceful in writing, but for me I only have passion when I am interested. I wrote a 200 page memoir in only a few months, and found out on the revision it needed little work, because I was passionate. I used to beat myself up about not putting my nose to the writing grindstone, but if I write junk, what is the point. I write when I feel like it now with no guilt.
4) I prefer to self-publish. I have heard too many people who have been scammed, and it fits in my life method of, "doing as much for myself as I can."
5) I write at the kitchen table, but my words are formed long before that. My therapy has always been getting outside so as I hike along, words, lines, sentaces, paragraphs and chapeters form, then I write it down at the kitchen table.
6) This goes along with my other rant I suppose, but I write when inspiration hits so it does not matter to me if a book takes a few months, or several years. I once wrote a short story, but could not figure out the ending, until 22 years later. To me it is no big deal, seldom in life does great things happen, when there is a hurry. Books and stories to me are similar.
7) I feel another rant about to start, but this is a huge pet peeve for me. I have seen this, and been roped into it, and that is people asking questions online when I know they are in the process of writing a book. In some cases I stay mum, but I do so because a book should be from them; their ideas, or their research, not my opinion. Whether we as writers like it or not, we assert ourselves as being an authority on what we are writing (for non-fiction anyway), and so it should be our work, not the opinions of others. Besides, a lot of people comment on things they have never really done, so does their opinion really matter? I am guilty of this myself. I have replied to micro-hydro questions, but I have never done it! I have a keen interest in it, and worked on major hydrodams, but I honestly should stay mum for online replies to micro-hydro questions. I would think it was amiss if some writer took what I wrote about micro-hydro dams and used it in a book, so with that in mind, I would never use someone's reply online to something I am writing about. It is a form of stealing intellectual property in my opinion for one, and lazy writing to boot.
If someone does seem to be an authority on a topic you are writing about, the better thing to do is befriend them, and then ask them to help you in your writing quest privately. That is then research, and acceptable, compared to just stealing their opinion and manipulating it with words to sound as if it is your opinion.