Stephen B. Thomas wrote:GAMCOD Plot size: 8ft x 25ft (200sq ft)
Acre Size: 43,560 sq ft
One Acre / GAMCOD Plot = 217.8
GAMCOD Calories expanded to cover a full acre = 20,570.5 * 217.8 = 4,480,254.9
...That seems like a lot, to me. Can someone help correct my calculations?
This has probably been discussed somewhere already - I didn't read 200 pages! - but when you extrapolated your square footage up to a full acre, did you account for pathways? I would figure 30-inch-wide pathways on all sides of your hugels to accommodate a wheelbarrow. Expanded out to an acre, that adds up to a significant non-productive footprint, which will reduce your total yield.
Theoretically, you could minimize the negative impact of pathways by doubling the length of each
hugel, so to require fewer pathways, or by rearranging your hugels and pathways into an interlocking keyhole pattern. Anything to maximize the productive footprint. But then again, you might wish to preserve your 8-foot-wide, 25-foot-long hugel bed dimension so as to keep your calculations true to your experimental test bed. Besides, that seems like a convenient size for real-world
gardening.
You should really map out on graph paper how many hugel beds and pathways you can fit into one (square? rectangular?) acre of land. One pathway serves the hugels on both sides of it. Once you have it on paper, you can play with dimensions and orientations as you wish to fit the most hugel beds into your space cleanly. Then you would arrive at a thoroughly realistic factor to multiply the square footage of your test bed to fill out an acre.