I've been surprised to see how violently attached some people are to their refrigerators. I yet to be convinced that they are a necessity for life and good health. YES, they HELP, but one can live without it, we have for most of human history.
The following is my position on the topic of fridglessness. It is one point of view as to why and how we can reduce or dependency on refrigeration.
Reasons people tell me fridges are necessary:
they are affordable - if one is wealthy enough to purchase an energy star fridge, then possibly... but that's begging the question. I don't know the numbers on fridges, and I don't really care. Anything that is a monthly drain, isn't affordable for many people in the world. Off grid fridges are more expensive to buy. they are eco-friendly - this should read they are more eco-friendly than previous generations of fridges... maybe... I don't know. Fridges have a lot more plastic in them now not to mention the distance traveled of the parts (and food that we put in the fridges), and the after life of the fridge, and the ecological impact of the electricity produced... You're smart enough to see how resource heavy fridges are. They are certainly not eco-friendly when compared to a hole in the ground.you would die without one - then we wouldn't have 7 billion people in this world. I don't know the numbers, but I suspect it's about half the world's population that live without refrigeration.okay then, you won't die, but you'll drastically shorten your life - Really? Are we sure we aren't being brainwashed here? Let's look at this some more. It's the only objection that comes close to convincing me... and if falls flat when I did my research.
First and most importantly, I agree that
a fridge is necessary when living a standard western diet, especially when consuming and storing pasteurized or canned food that have been opened! It is also necessary for some food that has been transported long distances. The way our food system is currently designed is fully dependent on the refrigerator to keep us safe.
So for a good understanding of what safe food without refrigeration looked like in the past, we have to go back, to a time and diet before the modern western one. One that does not include pasteurization or canning. This is also a time before air tight sealing was used for food (like plastic, or airlocks). People ate their food fresh, or preserved it with fermentation, cellaring, drying, and salting. These preservation techniques do not sterilize the food, rather they create environments that promote friendly bacteria and unfriendly to unfriendly bacteria. Food born illnesses were not as common as modern media leads us to believe. People knew how to keep their food safe, they wouldn't have survived to reproduce otherwise. Life expectancy is another cry of the pro-fridge movement. Wars, a life of hard work, infant mortality, and yes, some dietary issues like famine and poor nutrition were all contributing factors. Poor nutrition, I've learned, was not that poor. It was more the feast and famine pattern of the year, plus lack of fats in the peasants diet that caused most of (what we consider now) poor nutrition. What we consider now is less than 2000 calories, but compared to today's nutrition, there are schools of thought that suggest the pre-industrial diet was actually better nutritionally than what we eat in the West today. See the works of
Sally Fallon and the Western Price Foundation.
With the rise of
city living, lack of sanitation caused a great deal of illness, both in people directly, but also by raising livestock in condensed, unsanitary conditions. These were not necessarily caused by lack of refrigeration, but rather by greedy people not caring about what effects their actions had on others. The invention of pasteurization and understanding of germ theory allowed these modern foods (because we are entering the start of the modern food system here) produced in unsafe conditions (like Milk from unhealthy cows that had nasty stuff like TB) to be made safe through processing. This processing was widely accepted the same time as refrigeration was. So, yes, there is a correlation between refrigeration and increased health in the (urban) population. Correlation also exists between this health increase and germ theory and advances in medical technology.
A really important thing to note is that these modern food processing techniques like pasteurization, preservatives, and long distance transportation of fresh foods, require refrigeration to keep the food safe for human consumption. Only, they also came with a new set of safety challenges (like botulism which wasn't much of an issue before canning) Since this kind of food processing was so different than the historical norm, people needed educating on how to keep these new foods safe. Public education campaigns, food safe classes, advertisements, &c. Both industry and government worked hard to educate the public so we now believe that refrigeration is the one and only way to keep food safely.
I remember in high school, I asked my home economics teacher how people kept food safe before refrigeration. She told me, unequivocally, there wasn't a time before refrigerators. Being stubborn, I got a history book out of the library and showed her that there was indeed a time before refrigeration. He
answer was "they're all dead because they didn't have fridges". Whether or not she believed it, or was just parroting the party line, it goes to show you how well indoctrinated we are into believing electric refrigeration is necessary to survival.
As for life expectancy being longer now than it was before refrigeration. If we take infant mortality out of the equation, and look at projected life expectancy for people born today, who will have lived their entire life with refrigerated food... are we sure we want to say that refrigeration is the only factor that correlates to life expectancy? If we do, then it would make a convincing argument against refrigeration. But that's
my point, the fridge in and of itself is a symptom of modern food processing. If we remove these modern foods from our diet (while keeping many of the advancements from modern medicine - because one does not necessarily exclude the other), having a fridge in the home offers little benefit.
That said, I do currently live with a fridge. Raised on the modern western diet, I'm having to learn the traditional methods for
food preservation. Once I've completely kicked the habit of modern food, I hope to live with little or no refrigeration, but perhaps one small freezer because it's just so convenient. I'm telling you this so you don't think I'm suggesting everyone be without a fridge. I'm simply trying to expose some of the brainwashing we've been given to believe that it's absolutely necessary to survival.
Resources used for this post (to save you from the sin of asking for citation):
Sally Fallon's Nourishing Traditions
Cooking andDining in Medieval England by Peter Brears
Mrs Beaton's Book of Household Management
Terry Jones' Medieval Lives
Time Traveller's Guide to Medieval England by Ian Mortimer
Personal
experience time traveling in the 14th Century - I participate in an education display where we eat, sleep, and live in the year 1371 for a couple of weeks each year.
To a lesser extent:
in defence of foods by Michael Pollan
The Country House Kitchen 1650-1900 by Pamela A Sambrook & Peter Brears
Medieval Kitchen by Hannele Klemettila
Pleyn Delit by Hieatt and Butler
Medieval Kitchen by Odille Redon, Francoise Sabban and Silvano Serventi
art of natural cheese making by Asher
Paul's Podcast with Sally Fallon on Raw Milk
This post expresses my point of view based on my reading and understanding of the world. However, we are talking history here, which involves a certain amount of interpretation. There will never be a solid 'truth' one way or the other, because quite frankly most of the people who have done work in this field are bias, and they let that bias show in their work (I know I do). Mine is not the only conclusion made from the information presented here, but I'm not alone in it either.