Praying my way through the day
Creighton Samuiels wrote:I'm not trying to start more arguments, but I live in Kentucky, where there is no water shortage to speak of
Writer, artist, permaculture educator in a historic seaside neighborhood in Daytona Beach, Florida USA. Author of DEEP GREEN & other books.
Peter Ingot wrote:By the same logic, living without a washing machine would be slightly more bearable if we wore different clothes - shirts with detachable cuffs and collars for instance (something which went out around the time washing machines came in). I still value my washing machine very highly, but technology can become addictive rather than simply useful when we build our lives around it.
Writer, artist, permaculture educator in a historic seaside neighborhood in Daytona Beach, Florida USA. Author of DEEP GREEN & other books.
Jenny Nazak wrote:
Creighton Samuiels wrote:I'm not trying to start more arguments, but I live in Kentucky, where there is no water shortage to speak of
I live in Florida, where we get 49 inches of rain a year, so technically there is no water shortage here either. And yet I still feel compelled to minimize my consumption of fresh water, because we have a limited supply of it planet-wide.
Creighton Samuiels wrote:If you truly are concerned about the difference in water consumption between hand-washing dishes and using a dishwasher; you can buy a new water-compliant dishwasher available this year (which consume a maximum of 2.5 gallons per fill cycle, or typically 5 gallons per standard wash & rinse; I work in a dishwasher factory)
Creighton Samuiels wrote:or simply plant a deciduous tree. One adult tree will contribute about as much water into the air, and thus the water cycle, as an acre of ocean surface; and it is not difficult for an acre of woodlot to hold 50+ mature trees. As a bonus, you are also (temporarily) sequestering carbon during their growth.
Writer, artist, permaculture educator in a historic seaside neighborhood in Daytona Beach, Florida USA. Author of DEEP GREEN & other books.
Jenny Nazak wrote:
Creighton Samuiels wrote:If you truly are concerned about the difference in water consumption between hand-washing dishes and using a dishwasher; you can buy a new water-compliant dishwasher available this year (which consume a maximum of 2.5 gallons per fill cycle, or typically 5 gallons per standard wash & rinse; I work in a dishwasher factory)
EXCELLENT! An industry insider's perspective. Thank you. And it confirms that I use less water with my method. I use less *in my situation, the way I do it*. I can't speak for others. Some folks might be using 10 gallons of water to hand-wash their dishes. Those folks would save by getting one of these dishwashers you mention.
My method also uses less electricity than I would if I were to get a dishwasher. Not to mention the embodied energy of the dishwasher's manufacture, the additional hours I would need to work to earn the money to purchase the dishwasher, etc. (Some people have high-paying jobs and would laugh at that notion. I imagine there are some folks on here who earn enough in an hour or two to buy a dishwasher.)
paul wheaton wrote:I would like to add to that that if kids complain of their suffering doing chores like dishes, remind them that all that suffering helps them write good poetry when they are older.
I have read some comments about sterilizing dishes. I think that is a terrible idea. George Carlin has some thoughts in this space:
When a person tells me that a dishwasher is better because it saves water and then won't allow further discussion ... I feel like that person is not only wrong, but that person can never understand what I feel.
Thanks grandad. You're awesome.
nothing personal - only natural
I have never met a stranger, I have met some strange ones.
soloenespana.wordpress.com
Dan Boone wrote:
<snip>
I spent too much of my childhood washing dishes for a family of six using two dishpans (actually big stainless steel mixing bowls), one wash cloth, and a dish drainer. Big dishpan full of soap and water and dirtiest non-plastic dishes would be heated on the wood stove until water was "hot", along with a two-quart kettle of supplemental hot water. Small dishpan would have clean cold water in it, sometimes warmed a bit on the stove so it wouldn't be miserable to dip hands in. Hot kettle was used to top up the big dishpan as water splashed out (we had a two sinks draining into a slop-bucket arrangement) and dippers of cold water from the drinking water bucket (2.5 gallon) could be used to supplement the rinse as necessary. Protocol was to empty the five-gallon slop bucket before and after, so I can confirm that total water use was generally in the 3-4 gallon range. The project (starting with putting the cold water on the stove, emptying the slop bucket, filling the water bucket) usually took about an hour at kid pace. Slop water got slung into the woods behind the outhouse. All of our water was hauled quite a distance so, in winter, we'd sometimes be told to start with dishpan packed full of snow to minimize water use. No extra charge for the spruce needles and snowshoe hare poop.
I've seen several sentiments in this thread discounting the cost or the value of the time spent hand-washing dishes. There's the notion that dishwashing time can be quality social time, the notion that the person washing dishes doesn't have anything more valuable or interesting to do with the time, and the notion (expressed quite wittily) that time spent by children can be discounted because it's "automatic" from the perspective of some other person. It strikes me how contextual each of these notions must be, in order for it to be true. Dishwashing time in our cabin was never social, friendly, or familial; dishwashing was always a chore and frequently a punishment, carried out while other family members sat at leisure less than ten feet away ignoring the dishwashing process except to instruct/complain/bitch about perceived imperfections. Obviously it could have been different had my parents been other than they were, but in that context, house chores were never "quality time" and always an imposition into whatever activities we children felt had value (usually reading or getting the hell out of the cabin on whatever pretext). Forty years later I remain quite hostile to the notion that there's anything inherently pleasant or ennobling about routine repetitive chores; I would have to be very dull indeed if I could not imagine some better and more pleasant or productive use of my time. Being able to fill the sonic environment with entertainment or education is the best way to mitigate the opportunity cost of time lost to routine chores, and it's how I cope with them now. I can imagine (but have never experienced) filling the time with pleasant socializing. I cannot imagine thinking "I've got nothing better to do." Thinking "the kid has nothing better to do" would be hypocritical, and also suggests a parenting failure; the kid damned well should have something they are more excited about doing than washing dishes.
But I still wash dishes by hand (for reasons mostly economic) and other people wash dishes by hand to save water or energy or the fossil fuel embodied in the dishwater. My point is that these motives don't generalize well. Whether you want to save water versus expense versus time is hugely contextual. What are your circumstances, what are your values, what is the opportunity cost to you of an hour spent with a dishrag in hand? Everybody's got a different answer.
soloenespana.wordpress.com
My opinions are barely worth the paper they are written on here, but hopefully they can spark some new ideas, or at least a different train of thought
Work smarter, not harder.
"But if it's true that the only person over whom I have control of actions is myself, then it does matter what I do. It may not matter a jot to the world at large, but it matters to me." - John Seymour
The holy trinity of wholesomeness: Fred Rogers - be kind to others; Steve Irwin - be kind to animals; Bob Ross - be kind to yourself
Nina Jay wrote:We finally bought a dishwasher and now I fill and empty it every day and he sometimes helps. No more arguments about household chores.
'Every time I learn something new, it pushes some old stuff out of my brain.'
Mark Tudor wrote:A weeks worth of dishes is a lot... of dishes to own! I've known others who have like 20-30 settings of everything for 3 people, and things can pile up as a result, and even with a dishwasher it can take a day to catch up. My solution would be to get rid of most of those dishes, so you have 2-3 meals worth total and then there's no more meals until the dishes are done first. Worst case, they are washed just before reuse but at least the pile in the sink is smaller that way.
"But if it's true that the only person over whom I have control of actions is myself, then it does matter what I do. It may not matter a jot to the world at large, but it matters to me." - John Seymour
Nina Jay wrote:I couldn't find a way to solve this marital dilemma and bought a dishwasher instead... [another shameful face emoticon]
.
Trying to achieve self-reliance on a tiny suburban plot: http://gardenofgaladriel.blogspot.com
paul wheaton wrote:
I lived with my grandad for a few years starting when I was eleven. I tend to romanticize everything about that time. He didn't have a dishwasher. Everything was washed by hand. He cooked three meals a day for us, and I did the dishes. There were so few dishes that everything went pretty quickly. When I set the table, I pulled the dishes out of the dishrack. It was a simple and quick system. I cannot justify it, but it felt good and right. Our work is done. The idea of a dishwasher is a violation of this romantic notion: put your dirty dishes into a box and it will be dealt with later. The food will both rot and petrify in there. Then you keep pulling more and more dishes out of the cupboards and use those, and keep feeding dirty dishes into the box. Your work is not done - you have put it off. It just feels wrong. There is a festering mess of shame poorly concealed behind a plastic door. The way that we manage cleaning dishes is not dictated by the meal, but by the machine.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. βAlbert Einstein
Please give me your thoughts on my Affordable, double-paned earthbag window concept
"I discovered that all the misfortune of men comes from one thing, which is not knowing how to remain at rest in a room." Blaise Pascal
Burt Crews wrote:Why are most of post from 8 years ago?
Invasive plants are Earth's way of insisting we notice her medicines. Stephen Herrod Buhner
Everyone learns what works by learning what doesn't work. Stephen Herrod Buhner
Is that a banana in your pocket? I'm just asking for this tiny ad:
permaculture and gardener gifts (stocking stuffers?)
https://permies.com/wiki/permaculture-gifts-stocking-stuffers
|